Immediate Great Toe Transfer for Thumb Reconstruction After Tumor Resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern oncologic surgery aims not only to obtain tumor-free margins but also to spare or reconstruct limb function and preserve quality of life. A negative tumor margin in the digit generally requires amputation; therefore, function is preserved with reconstruction. We report results of simultaneous ablative tumor resection and reconstruction with a great toe transfer in patients requiring surgery for aggressive benign and malignant thumb tumors. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2009, three patients with extensive soft tissue tumors of the distal thumb underwent amputation to obtain wide negative surgical margins. In each case, an immediate trimmed toe-to-thumb transfer was performed. Results, evaluated retrospectively, included a review of perioperative complications, donor-site morbidity, oncologic status, objective functional outcomes, and subjective patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Three patients were found with either locally aggressive benign (n = 1) or malignant (n = 2) tumors of the thumb. All patients underwent immediate reconstruction after amputation through the base of the proximal phalanx for tumor eradication. No perioperative complications were encountered, and all toes survived. Full thumb opposition and protective sensation were achieved in all patients. All patients returned to their previous occupation without functional limitations. There is no local or distant tumor recurrence. Delayed wound healing at the ipsilateral foot donor site occurred in all 3 patients. Wet-to-dry dressing changes were successful in 2 patients, whereas the third patient required full-thickness skin grafting. All patients were satisfied with their reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: An immediate great toe-to-thumb transfer should be considered when thumb amputation is required to satisfy adequate oncologic margins. Such a transfer provides simultaneous restoration of digit length, position, sensation, and acceptable esthetics. This procedure is technically demanding and requires an experienced microsurgical team as well as appropriate patient counseling and consent before surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".