Distortions in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Measurements Using 3‐Electrode Methods in SOFC. II. Effect of Electrode Activity and Relaxation Times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The 3‐electrode configuration is commonly applied to quantify the overpotential of anodes or cathodes in solid‐oxide fuel cells (SOFC). In this type of set‐up, a reference electrode (RE) is used to isolate the potential loss of one electrode from that of the entire cell; however, erroneous results can be obtained whenever the RE does not precisely separate the potential drop between the two active electrodes. In this study, we present the results of a theoretical and experimental analysis focused on verifying the effectiveness of the 3‐electrode configuration in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements for the kinetic characterisation of SOFC electrode reactions. The focus of this paper is on the distortion of impedance measurements caused by differences in the area‐specific polarisation resistance and impedance time constants of the working and counter electrodes. The results obtained numerically and experimentally, both for planar and tubular SOFC cell geometries, prove the reliability of the theoretical model used. From the systematic simulation presented here and in our previous work, it was possible to formulate general guidelines for the design of 3‐electrode experimental SOFC. The theoretical model used here can also be used to verify the consistency of EIS measurements obtained with thin planar cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it