Inhibition of Insulin-Stimulated Glycogen Synthesis by 5-Aminoimidasole-4-Carboxamide-1-β-d-Ribofuranoside-Induced Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase Activation: Interactions with Akt, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3-3α/β, and Glycogen Synthase in Isolated Rat Soleus Muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 5-aminoimidasole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR)-induced AMP-activated protein kinase activation on glycogen metabolism in soleus (slow twitch, oxidative) and epitrochlearis (fast twitch, glycolytic) skeletal muscles. Isolated soleus and epitrochlearis muscles were incubated in the absence or presence of insulin (100 nM), AICAR (2 mM), and AICAR plus insulin. In soleus muscles exposed to insulin, glycogen synthesis and glycogen content increased 6.4- and 1.3-fold, respectively. AICAR treatment significantly suppressed ( approximately 60%) insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis and completely prevented the increase in glycogen content induced by insulin. AICAR did not affect either basal or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake but significantly increased insulin-stimulated ( approximately 20%) lactate production in soleus muscles. Interestingly, basal glucose uptake was significantly increased ( approximately 1.4-fold) in the epitrochlearis muscle, even though neither basal nor insulin-stimulated rates of glycogen synthesis, glycogen content, and lactate production were affected by AICAR. We also report the novel evidence that AICAR markedly reduced insulin-induced Akt-Thr308 phosphorylation after 15 and 30 min exposure to insulin, which coincided with a marked reduction in glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK)-3alpha/beta phosphorylation. Importantly, phosphorylation of glycogen synthase was increased by AICAR treatment 45 min after insulin stimulation. Our results indicate that AICAR-induced AMP-activated protein kinase activation caused a time-dependent reduction in Akt308 phosphorylation, activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3alpha/beta, and the inactivation of glycogen synthase, which are compatible with the acute reduction in insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in oxidative but not glycolytic skeletal muscles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".