Measurement of the Inclusive Electron Neutrino Charged Current Cross Section on Carbon with the T2K Near Detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The T2K off-axis near detector ND280 is used to make the first differential cross-section measurements of electron neutrino charged current interactions at energies $\ensuremath{\sim}1\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ as a function of electron momentum, electron scattering angle, and four-momentum transfer of the interaction. The total flux-averaged ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ charged current cross section on carbon is measured to be $⟨\ensuremath{\sigma}{⟩}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}=1.11\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.10(\text{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.18(\text{syst})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}38}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\text{nucleon}$. The differential and total cross-section measurements agree with the predictions of two leading neutrino interaction generators, NEUT and GENIE. The NEUT prediction is $1.23\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}38}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\text{nucleon}$ and the GENIE prediction is $1.08\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}38}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\text{nucleon}$. The total ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ charged current cross-section result is also in agreement with data from the Gargamelle experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".