MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050299929 · doi:10.4161/cc.10.12.15882

UBE4B, a ubiquitin chain assembly factor, is required for MDM2-mediated p53 polyubiquitination and degradation

2011· review· en· W2050299929 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong Wu, Roger Leng

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsHeritage Medical Research ClinicUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMdm2Ubiquitin ligaseTransactivationUbiquitinBiologyCell biologySuppressorDNA ligaseCancer researchApoptosisBiochemistryTranscription factorDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although MDM2 is known to be a critical negative regulator of p53, MDM2 only catalyzes p53 mono- or multiple monoubiquitination in vitro and in vivo, which is insufficient for the initiation of proteasomal degradation. MDM2 does not polyubiquitinate p53 in vitro, however, which indicates that the activity of other ubiquitin ligase(s) or cofactor(s) is required for MDM2-mediated p53 polyubiquitination and degradation. In our recent study, we demonstrated that UBE4B, an E3 and E4 ubiquitin ligase with a U-box domain, interacts physically with both p53 and MDM2. Our findings revealed that UBE4B negatively regulates the level of p53 and inhibits p53-dependent transactivation and apoptosis. We propose that inhibition of MDM2 binding to UBE4B may provide another approach to inhibit MDM2 E3 ligase activity for tumor suppressor p53. It could lead to novel anticancer therapies, with the possibility of reducing the public health burden from cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207