An examination of gender differences in work-family conflict.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de la presente etude, nous avons elabore et mis a l'essai un modele d'integration de la relation entre le travail et la famille. Ce modele a ete applique separement aux sous-echantillons d'hommes et de femmes de maniere a evaluer la moyenne des differences entre les sexes ainsi que les differences entre les sexes en fonction des variables. Les analyses s'appuyaient sur les donnees d'un questionnaire auxquels avaient repondu 320 participants, des employes professionnels travaillant a plein temps dans des organisations canadiennes. Nous avons observe des differences entre les sexes en ce qui a trait au lien entre les exigences familiales et l'interference de la famille dans le travail, tandis que les resultats obtenus en ce qui a trait a l'interference de la famille dans le travail et la satisfaction professionnelle, la satisfaction familiale et la satisfaction personnelle etaient ambigus. En regle generale, ces resultats viennent appuyer les conclusions d'une precedente recherche, qui indiquait qu'il existe encore une asymetrie entre les roles joues par les hommes et les femmes au travail et dans la famille. Les limites et les questions d'ordre pratique issues de ces conclusions sont abordees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".