MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050343053 · doi:10.1080/15459620701547233

Hand-Held Photoionization Instruments for Quantitative Detection of Sarin Vapor and for Rapid Qualitative Screening of Contaminated Objects

2007· article· en· W2050343053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical Safety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationDetectorSarinEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineChemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suitable detectors are needed to support survey needs of incident responders and health care personnel who may receive patients from an incident with exposures to hazardous chemicals. In the health care setting, such a detector would avoid cross-contamination to workers, patients, and to the treatment facility and associated equipment. An ideal survey detector would be sensitive, hand-held, capable of extended battery operation, and would provide a nearly immediate detector response on exposure to a broad range of high-concern chemicals. For responders, important capabilities would include quantitative measurement of gas/vapor contamination, and for both response and health care settings, qualitative detection of contaminated people and objects. In this study, the operating characteristics of photoionization detector (PID) instruments were examined using O-isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate (sarin) in a laboratory setting. Instrument response factors were calculated for quantitation of airborne sarin, and speed of detector response and recovery were examined with point-contaminated cloth material. By sampling a range of sarin-contaminated air, calculated isobutylene unit response factors for high-and moderate-sensitivity commercial PID instrument types were 11.3 and 14.0 (dry air) and 20.1 and 44.4 (50% relative humidity), respectively. Response of the PID systems was highly correlated to concentration sampled, with R(2) values greater than or equal to 0.997 for all combinations of PID detector type and humidity. While not sensitive enough to warn the unprotected public against a chemical with an extremely low "safe" exposure concentration, quantitation with available PID instruments could be useful to quickly prioritize corrective measures for a PID-detectable chemical. Qualitative survey characteristics were examined for the more sensitive PID tested using a piece of cloth material contaminated by a 1.0 micro L droplet of liquid sarin. Rapid response and recovery times (seconds) were observed when the sampling inlet was moved close to and away from the point of contamination. Within the health care setting, hand-held PID instruments could fill an important and currently unmet need as a point source detector for liquid contamination from extremely dangerous chemicals to help identify contaminated surfaces and limit secondary contamination and exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it