Preference for Ribose Over Deoxyribose in Loop-Closing Base Pairs of Extra Stable Nucleic Acid Hairpins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have investigated the effect of switching ribose to deoxyribose at the closing base-pair of an extra-stable RNA hairpin. Specifically, we studied the sequence 5'-GGAC(UUCG)GUCC, a dodecanucleotide that folds into a well-characterized, "extra stable" RNA hairpin structure. Recently, we showed that hairpins containing a 2',5'-linked (UUCG) loop instead of the native 3',5'-linked loop also exhibit extra-stability (Hannoush and Damha, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 12368-12374). In this article, we show that the ribose units located at the loop-closing positions (i.e., rC4 and rG9) contribute significantly to the stabilization of RNA hairpins, particularly those containing the 3',5'-UUCG loop. Interestingly, the requirement of rC4 and rG9 is more relaxed for DNA hairpins containing the 2',5'-UUCC loop and, in fact, they may be replaced altogether (ribose--> deoxyribose) without affecting stability. The results broaden our understanding of the behavior of highly stable (UUCG) hairpin loops and how they respond to structural perturbation of the loop-closing base pairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".