Neurologic Outcome at School Entry for Newborns Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Noncardiac Indications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The neurologic outcomes at school age in children who underwent neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for noncardiac indications in a single institution surviving till the age of 5 years was determined by standardized neurologic assessment. Of 42 newborns undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 24 underwent neurologic assessment by a single neurologist at 5 years of age. In all, 12 (50%) had a normal neurologic outcome. Lower gestational age and birth weight was found to be associated with an abnormal outcome as was septic shock as an indication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation. The number of peri-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation complications experienced by a child was associated with later epilepsy. Although invasive and implemented in critically ill infants, half of newborns undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation will have a normal neurologic outcome at school age. Preexisting factors, rather than factors related to the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation itself, appear to be greater determinants of later neurologic outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".