MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050519092 · doi:10.4043/24318-ms

Development of Titanium Process Piping Welding/Assembly

2013· article· en· W2050519092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. F. P. Gondim, C. Conzaga

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Brasil · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTitanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeldingPipingWeldabilityTitaniumManufacturing engineeringMechanical engineeringMetallurgyComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper presents the step by step from the receipt, storage and transportation, pre-assembly up to the field welding developed in the assembly of titanium process piping. It was possible to verify and list critical recommendations since the handling step until the final evaluation of welding, in addition to the technical characteristics and advantages of using titanium to replace some of the usual materials industry due to its flexibility and mechanical strength, described below and exemplified throughout this work. The requirements of the manufacturer were the main points to be followed and all the supplier requests were considerable to achieve the higher quality level during the activities. Furthermore, some technics as observe the color of the weld and heat affected zone to check the existence of defects was used during the activities. Since the use of this material in the petroleum industry is growing up in scale and it has fundamental importance of the chemical and metallurgical point of view, the study has the objective of showing the best practices to erect piping, even knowing the difficulties of weldability. This approach brings several points to growth of knowledge of the activity, mainly due the small bibliography available about this subject. Introduction Titanium was recognized as a chemical element more than 200 years ago. Only in the last 40 years, however, it gained strategic importance. During that time, commercial production of titanium and its alloys has grown from zero to well over 23 million quilos per year in the United States. World production of metallic titanium is in the order of 99,000 tons and the main mining areas are in Norway, India, Brazil, Canada, the United States and Russia and their main sources are rutile (TiO2) and ilmenite (TiO3). The considerable growth was initiated due to the development by Dr. Wilhelm J. Kroll of a relatively safe and economical production of titanium metal in the late '30s. After 1940, the mechanical and physical properties of this element have been defined and the commercial importance of this metal was evident. Currently, the increasing production of titanium is mainly due to the development of biomechanics industry and the expansion of petrochemical industry. By presenting approximately 60% of the steel weight, excellent mechanical properties such as resistance to corrosion and temperature variations and allows their manufacture in various forms required, the pure metal and its alloys have been used for the manufacture of surgical implants. In petrochemical industry, the world market is undergoing drastic changes as the growth of production and export capacity of Middle East, the replacement of the United States and Europe to Asia as the main consumer market. Furthermore, the integration of oil refining and petrochemical production is a recurring theme of studies on oil processing, in order to take advantages of synergies in these activities. Thus, as the oxidation reactor of a PTA (Purified Terephthalic Acid) plant and its pipings are lined with titanium, the demand for this element has been continuously increasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC BrasilSame topicTitanium Alloys Microstructure and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207