Neonatal immune challenge alters nociception in the adult rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intense pain or intense peripheral inflammation experienced during development can have pronounced effects upon adult pain sensation. However, little is known about the more commonly encountered mild systemic inflammation, such as that experienced with mild illness. Neonatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an established model of immune system activation, has been shown to affect febrile and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) responses to a similar exposure in adulthood. Adult LPS also elicits a range of sickness behaviours, including enhanced responses to painful stimuli. We, therefore, hypothesized that adult sensation and pain responses could be affected by a neonatal LPS challenge. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were administered LPS at postnatal day 14 and were tested in adulthood for nociceptive responses to thermal and mechanical stimuli using, respectively, a plantar test apparatus and von Frey filaments, before and after adult LPS. Expression of dorsal root ganglion and lumbar spinal cord COX-2 was also examined. Animals treated as neonates with saline showed the expected hypersensitivity to painful stimuli after adult LPS as well as enhanced spinal cord COX-2. Neonatally LPS-treated rats, however, showed a significantly different profile. They displayed enhanced baseline nociception and elevated basal spinal cord COX-2 compared with neonatally saline-treated rats. Also, rather than the expected hyperalgesia after adult LPS, no changes in nociceptive responses and a reduction in spinal cord COX-2 expression were observed. These findings have important implications for the understanding of pain and its management and highlight the importance of the neonatal period in the development of pain pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".