Mass Spectrometry Following Mild Enzymatic Digestion Reveals Phosphorylation of Recombinant Proteins in <i>Escherichia coli</i> Through Mechanisms Involving Direct Nucleotide Binding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A straightforward method using mild enzymatic digestions combined with MALDI mass spectrometry (MS) was used to enhance determination of the multiple phosphorylation sites of a set of recombinant nucleotide-binding proteins in Escherichia coli, including kinases and cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) domain containing proteins. The protein kinases reveal abundant phosphorylations in the kinase domains and relatively low phosphogluconoylation (258 Da) at the N-terminal His-tag. In contrast, the CBS domain-containing proteins possess a highly conserved phosphorylation in vivo at Ser-2 of the His-tag. Multistage MS/MS and selected reaction monitoring established that the CBS domain proteins also contain a combined modification of gluconoylation (178 Da) and phosphorylation (80 Da) at two different sites, instead of an isobaric phosphogluconoylation (258 Da) event at the N-terminus. Functional analysis of 20 recombinant proteins as identified by mass spectrometry has shown the phosphorylation at the N-terminal His-tag is relevant to nucleotide binding and phosphotransfer reaction catalyzed by a serine protein kinase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it