Bibliographic record
Abstract
M-DNA is a complex between the divalent metal ions Zn2+, Ni2+ and Co2+ and duplex DNA which forms at a pH of approximately 8.5. The stability and formation of M-DNA was monitored with an ethidium fluorescence assay in order to assess the relationship between pH, metal ion concentration, DNA concentration and the base composition. The dismutation of calf thymus DNA exhibits hysteresis with the formation of M-DNA occurring at a higher pH than the reconversion of M-DNA back to B-DNA. Hysteresis is most prominent with the Ni form of M-DNA where complete reconversion to B-DNA takes several hours even in the presence of EDTA. Increasing the DNA concentration leads to an increase in the metal ion concentration required for M-DNA formation. Both poly(dG)*poly(dC) and poly(dA)*poly(dT) formed M-DNA more readily than the corresponding mixed sequence DNAs. For poly(dG)*(poly(dC) M-DNA formation was observed at pH 7.4 with 0.5 mM ZnCl2. Modified bases were incorporated into a 500 bp fragment of phage lambda DNA by polymerase chain reaction. DNAs in which guanine was replaced with hypoxanthine or thymine with 5-fluorouracil formed M-DNA at pHs below 8 whereas substitutions such as 2-aminoadenine and 5-methylcytosine had little effect. Poly[d(A5FU)] also formed a very stable M-DNA duplex as judged from T(m) measurements. It is evident that the lower the pK(a) of the imino proton of the base, the lower the pH at which M-DNA will form; a finding that is consistent with the replacement of the imino proton with the metal ion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".