MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050606109 · doi:10.1159/000066118

Phase II Study of Repeated Single 24-Hour Infusion of Low-Dose 5-Fluorouracil for Palliation in Symptomatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

2002· article· en· W2050606109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Axel Bex, T. Otto, G. Lümmen, H. Rübben

Bibliographic record

VenueUrologia Internationalis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerRegimenFluorouracilChemotherapyToxicityProstateRefractory (planetary science)SurgeryHormonal therapyUrologyProstate-specific antigenProspective cohort studyProgressive diseaseCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of repeated single 24-hour infusion of low-dose 5-fluorouracil for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer using relevant endpoints of palliation and biological response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 25 patients with histologically confirmed prostatic adenocarcinoma and symptomatic progressive disease despite one or several hormonal treatments and chemotherapy were included in the study. Treatment consisted of a single 24-hour infusion of 500 mg/m(2) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to be repeated on day 21. This regimen was continued until either progression or serious toxicity occurred. Response was assessed by serial measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as well as by health-related quality-of-life instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and McGill-Melzack Present Pain Intensity Scale) every 3 weeks. In 10 patients with bidimensionally measurable metastases, objective responses were assessed every 3 months. RESULTS: A mean number of four courses of repeated single 24-hour infusion of 5-FU was administered (range 2-6). Toxicity was absent or mild, and no patient had to be withdrawn from therapy. All patients required analgesics prior to treatment and only 3 patients experienced a significant reduction in pain for 9 weeks, the remaining patients experienced no deterioration for a mean duration of 12 weeks (6-18 weeks). Five patients (20%) demonstrated a biological response of a 50% or greater decrease in PSA from baseline, including 2 (12%) with a 75% or greater decline for 10 weeks (range 6-16 weeks). One partial remission was observed among 10 patients with measurable lesions lasting 12 weeks; 4 patients had stable disease with a mean duration of 12 weeks. Mean survival time from the onset of treatment with 5-FU was 7 months (2-12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Though less toxic than other 5-FU regimens, repeated single low-dose 24-hour infusion is of no significant benefit in patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrologia InternationalisSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207