MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050625694 · doi:10.1116/1.2186656

Fabrication of out-of-plane micromirrors in silicon-on-insulator planar waveguides

2006· article· en· W2050625694 on OpenAlexaff
B. Lamontagne, Pavel Cheben, E. Post, Siegfried Janz, Dan‐Xia Xu, A. Delâge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoupling lossMaterials scienceFinite-difference time-domain methodOpticsWaveguideFabricationSilicon on insulatorPlanarBeam propagation methodOptoelectronicsReturn lossSiliconOptical fiberRefractive indexPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging optical waveguide spectrometers, sensors, and biochips require the simultaneous acquisition of numerous optical signals. Aligning many tens or hundreds of optical fibers to waveguides is a formidable and costly exercise in packaging. We propose a data acquisition scheme using arrays of micromirrors to redirect light propagating in each waveguide out of the device surface, where all the beams can be collected by a single imaging array. Micromirrors, which are the key elements in this data acquisition scheme, were fabricated in 2μm thick silicon-on-insulator waveguides. Chemically assisted ion beam etching (CAIBE) was used to obtain inclined mirror facets, benefiting from the unique capability of CAIBE to tilt the sample relative to the ion beam. Finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations of an ideal micromirror oriented at 45° to the propagation direction predict a >96% out-coupling efficiency (loss of 0.14dB) and a negligible polarization dependent loss (PDL). The measured total insertion loss for the fabricated waveguide and mirror was −5dB, including fiber-to-waveguide coupling loss, waveguide propagation loss, and mirror loss due to fabrication errors and diffraction, with a PDL of 0.7dB. The dependence of micromirror performance on facet angle and etch depth was studied by FDTD simulations. The influence of CAIBE etching chemistry and selectivity in obtaining optimum mirror parameters is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207