Neuronal Intranuclear Inclusions Distinguish Familial FTD-MND Type from Sporadic Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ubiquitin-immunoreactive (ub-ir) neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions are characteristically found in the extramotor cortex in patients with motor neuron disease (MND) and dementia (MND-dementia) and in a subset of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) without motor symptoms (FTD-MND type). Recently, ub-ir neuronal intranuclear inclusions have been described in a small number of patients with familial FTD-MND type. To better define the sensitivity and specificity of this pathological change, we examined postmortem tissue from 14 patients with FTD-MND type (8 familial, 6 sporadic), 10 cases of MND-dementia (5 familial, 5 sporadic) and 19 cases of MND with no history of cognitive dysfunction (2 familial, 17 sporadic). Numerous intranuclear inclusions were found in multiple anatomic sites in 6/8 cases of familial FTD-MND. Rare intranuclear inclusions were present in the hippocampal dentate granule cells in 1 case of familial MND-dementia. No sporadic cases had intranuclear inclusions. These findings suggest that intranuclear inclusions are specific for familial FTD and may identify a subset of families with a common genetic basis. Although intranuclear inclusions are most characteristic of families with pure FTD, they may also be found in some pedigrees with both FTD and MND, further supporting the hypothesis that FTD-MND type and MND-dementia represent a clinicopathological spectrum of disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".