Vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth in multiple pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: We sought to assess the effect of progesterone in increasing or decreasing duration of pregnancy for mothers with twins and triplets. METHODS: Women with multiple pregnancy were randomized at 16+0 to 20+6 weeks' gestation to receive daily doses of either 90 mg progesterone vaginal gel or placebo until 35+6 weeks or delivery. Primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, infant morbidity and mortality, and adverse events up to 28 days after delivery. A sample size of 40 per group was required to detect a 2-week difference in GA at delivery. RESULTS: Eighty-four women were randomized (42 to progesterone, 42 to placebo). Median GA at delivery was 36+3 and 36+2, respectively (difference, 1 day; 95% confidence interval, 4 to -1 days, P=0.585). There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between groups for risk of delivery before 35 or 37 weeks' GA, rates of infant morbidity and mortality, treatment compliance, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Daily treatment with progesterone gel did not prolong multiple pregnancy compared with placebo. Effective prevention strategies are needed to reduce preterm deliveries among women with multiple gestations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".