Magnetic refrigeration: Single and multimaterial active magnetic regenerator experiments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation of active magnetic regenerators (AMRs) has been performed near room temperature using helium as a heat transfer fluid and a magnetic field of 2 T. To evaluate the impact of the operating conditions, the performance of two reciprocating 90 g gadolinium packed bed regenerators was mapped as a function of the fluid flux and cycle frequency. In addition, two multilayer regenerators of similar mass and dimensions, composed of a layer of gadolinium and a layer of a gadolinium–terbium alloy, were tested and compared to the performance of the Gd-only regenerators. The multilayer regenerators produced a larger temperature span and cooling power compared to the single material regenerators of equivalent mass and geometry (temperature spans of about 20 and 16 K, respectively). Theses results validate the concept of a multilayer AMR, provide useful data for magnetic refrigerator design, and provide better understanding of active magnetic refrigeration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it