Localization of the 12.6-kDa FK506-binding Protein (FKBP12.6) Binding Site to the NH2-terminal Domain of the Cardiac Ca2+ Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 12.6-kDa FK506-binding protein (FKBP12.6) interacts with the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) and modulates its channel function. However, the molecular basis of FKBP12.6-RyR2 interaction is poorly understood. To investigate the significance of the isoleucine-proline (residues 2427-2428) dipeptide epitope, which is thought to form an essential part of the FKBP12.6 binding site in RyR2, we generated single and double mutants, P2428Q, I2427E/P2428A, and P2428A/L2429E, expressed them in HEK293 cells, and assessed their ability to bind GST-FKBP12.6. None of these mutations abolished GST-FKBP12.6 binding, indicating that this isoleucine-proline motif is unlikely to form the core of the FKBP12.6 binding site in RyR2. To systematically define the molecular determinants of FKBP12.6 binding, we constructed a series of internal and NH(2)- and COOH-terminal deletion mutants of RyR2 and examined the effect of these deletions on GST-FKBP12.6 binding. These deletion analyses revealed that the first 305 NH(2)-terminal residues and COOH-terminal residues 1937-4967 are not essential for GST-FKBP12.6 binding, whereas multiple sequences within a large region between residues 305 and 1937 are required for GST-FKBP12.6 interaction. Furthermore, an NH(2)-terminal fragment containing the first 1937 residues is sufficient for GST-FKBP12.6 binding. Co-expression of overlapping NH(2) and COOH-terminal fragments covering the entire sequence of RyR2 produced functional channels but did not restore GST-FKBP12.6 binding. These data suggest that FKBP12.6 binding is likely to be conformationdependent. Binding of FKBP12.6 to the NH(2)-terminal domain may play a role in stabilizing the conformation of this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".