MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050765086 · doi:10.1080/07060660309507076

Cloning and characterization of a gene coding for a class I chitin synthase from <i>Fusarium graminearum</i>

2003· article· en· W2050765086 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heping Li, Cheng-Ying Fu, Dieter Peschen, Xingyuan Ling, Rainer Fischer, Yu‐Cai Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicStudies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChitin synthaseBiologyGeneNeurospora crassaOpen reading frameGeneticsIntronCoding regionComplementary DNARapid amplification of cDNA endsSpore germinationMolecular biologyChitinPeptide sequenceMicrobiologyBiochemistrySpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The full-length sequence of a gene coding for a class I chitin synthase (Chs) from Fusarium graminearum (Fg) was isolated by genome walking, using gene-specific primers and walking libraries constructed with a panel of eight restriction enzymes. Analysis of the gene (named FgChs1) and its corresponding cDNA revealed an open reading frame of 2703 bp interrupted by two introns of 120 and 55 bp, respectively. FgChs1 is a single-copy gene. Its deduced amino acid sequence shows 77% identity to Neurospora crassa Chs3 and 73% identity to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ChsA in the conserved central region (residues 153 to 800). Quantitative reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction was used to compare the levels of FgChs1 mRNA at different stages of development. This showed that FgChs1 was developmentally regulated, with peaks of expression during spore germination and mycelial growth. The first significant increase in FgChs1 mRNA levels was detected after 1 day of hyphal growth while the second peak was apparent after 5 days. This result suggests that FgChs1 may play an important role in fungal growth and development. Keywords: Fusarium graminearumchitin synthasequantitative reverse transcription – polymerase chain reactiongenome walking

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesFrench-language works237,207