MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recovery Behaviour at the Inter-Alloy Region of a Cold Rolled Clad Aluminum Alloy

2011· article· en· W2050823744 on OpenAlexafffund
Debartha Bag, B.J. Diak, Hai Ou Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)Queen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlloyMaterials scienceIsothermal processRecrystallization (geology)MetallurgyAnnealing (glass)Indentation hardnessDrop (telecommunication)AluminiumComposite materialMicrostructureThermodynamicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the recovery behaviour of the inter-alloy region between a core AA6XXX clad with AA3003 after 72% rolling reduction. Sample coupons were heated isochronally or isothermally, at different temperatures or times, respectively, to probe the recovery kinetics of x-ray peak broadening, x-ray macro-texture, and micro-hardness from the cold rolled state. The inter-alloy region had a strong β-fibre typical of rolled Al. The recovery of the {220} and {311} x-ray line profiles were observed between anneals. The full width half maximum was determined from a pseudo-Voigt fit of the profiles to obtain the defect-related information. Distinct changes in the peak shape and microhardness were observed above 80°C (start of recovery), which goes on all the way to 300°C due to recovery, and beyond 300°C both hardness and peak width drop rapidly (recrystallization start), the latter behaviour being closer to AA3004. Modified Williamson-Hall analysis confirms that recovery is due to dislocation annihilation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207