Circadian pattern of ventilation during acute and chronic hypercapnia in conscious adult rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because metabolism is a determinant of the ventilatory chemosensitivity, we tested the hypothesis that the ventilatory response to acute and prolonged hypercapnia is adjusted to the circadian oscillations in oxygen consumption (VO2). Adult rats were instrumented for measurements of body temperature (T(b)) and activity by telemetry. Pulmonary ventilation (VE) was measured by the barometric method and VO2 by the flow-through method. In the acute experiments, 16 conscious rats entrained to a 12:12-h light (L)-dark (D) cycle (lights on 7:00 AM) were exposed to air, 2%, and then 5% CO2 in normoxia (30-45 min each) at 11:00 AM and 11:00 PM. In a separate group of seven rats, simultaneous recordings of all variables were made continuously for 3 consecutive days in air followed by 3 days in 2% CO2 in normoxia, in a 12:12-h L-D cycle (lights on 7:00 AM). In air, all variables were significantly higher at night, whether rats were studied acutely or chronically. Acute CO2 exposure had similar significant effects at 11:00 AM and 11:00 PM on VE (approximately 25 and 100% increase with 2 and 5% CO2, respectively) and VO2 (approximately 8% drop with 5% CO2), such that the hyperventilatory response (% increase in VE/VO2 from air) was similar at both times. Chronic CO2 breathing increased VE at all times of the day, but less so during the L phase (approximately 15 vs. 22% increase in L and D, respectively), when activity was lower. However, VO2 was reduced from the air level (approximately 10% drop) in the L, such that the VE/VO2 response was similar between L and D. The same result was obtained when the VE/VO2 response was compared between the L and D phases for the same level of activity. These results suggest that, throughout the day, the hypercapnic hyperpnea, whether during acute or prolonged CO2, is perfectly adjusted to the metabolic level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".