MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050881833 · doi:10.1080/00396330701254693

Review Essay: Torture and Incompetence in the ‘War on Terror’

2007· article· en· W2050881833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurvival · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTorture, Ethics, and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortureLawPolitical scienceParliamentState (computer science)Human rightsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. See especially the report, containing much new information, prepared by the investigator appointed by the Council of Europe's Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, the Swiss senator Dick Marty, Alleged Secret Detentions and Unlawful Inter-state Transfers of Detainees Involving Council of Europe Member States (Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly Doc. 10957, 12 June 2006), available at http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/doc06/edoc10957.pdf. 2. The Congressional Research Service report, based on available open-source documentation and not on any new investigation, is Undisclosed U.S. Detention Sites Overseas: Background and Legal Issues (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 12 September 2006), available at http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs. 3. European Parliament, Temporary Committee on the Alleged Use of European Countries by the CIA for the Transportation and Illegal Detention of Prisoners, Final Report, 26 January 2007, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/tempcom/tdip/default_en.htm. 4. The poll was conducted between November 2006 and January 2007. The results, published on 23 January 2007, plus links to related sites, are available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/01_january/23/us.shtml 5. A vigorous argument that torture, apart from being objectionable on moral grounds, does not yield useful intelligence results, was made in a letter from intelligence and military professionals submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee on 26 September 2006. Available at: http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/64/22776. 6. President George Bush, Memorandum on 'Humane Treatment of al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees', 7 February 2002. 7. White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 'Fact Sheet: Status of Detainees at Guantanamo', 7 February 2002, p. 1. 8. ISAF was originally established in Afghanistan in January 2002 on the basis of UN Security Council Resolution 1386 of 20 December 2001, passed unanimously. Subsequent resolutions extending and modifying ISAF's mandate, structure and scope of operations are: UNSCR 1413 of 23 May 2002, UNSCR 1444 of 27 November 2002, UNSCR 1510 of 13 October 2003, UNSCR 1563 of 17 September 2004, UNSCR 1623 of 13 September 2005, and UNSCR 1659 of 15 February 2006. NATO has exercised command and control of ISAF since 11 August 2003. 9. Military Technical Agreement between the International Security Assistance Force and the Interim Administration of Afghanistan, 4 January 2002, Article III(1). Text in International Legal Materials , vol. 41, no. 5, September 2002, p. 1032. Text (plus annexes) also available at http://www.operations.mod.uk/isafmta.pdf. 10. The ISAF website is http://www.jfcbs.nato.int/ISAF/index.htm. 11. The CFCA website is http://www.cfc-a.centcom.mil. 12. 'Arrangement for the Transfer of Detainees between the Canadian Forces and the Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan', Kabul, 18 December 2005, available at http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/operations/archer/agreement_e.asp. 13. 'Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Minister of Defense of the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning the transfer of persons by Netherlands military forces in Afghanistan to Afghan authorities, 'concluded in late 2005, available at http://www.minbuza.nl/nl/actueel/brievenparlement,2006/02/kamerbrief_afghanistan_overzicht_van_bijdragenx_eu_inzet_volgens_razeb_en_verslag_van_de_londen_conferentie___bijlage_3.html. 14. Paragraph 1 of 'Standard Operating Procedures: Detention of Non-ISAF Personnel', SOP 362, Headquarters, ISAF, Kabul, 2nd ed., 23 May 2006. Copy on file with author. Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdam RobertsAdam Roberts is Montague Burton Professor of International Relations at Oxford University and a Fellow of Balliol College. His books include (as joint author) Terrorism and International Order (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul for Chatham House, 1986).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it