The Recognition of<i>Ophiomorpha irregulaire</i>on the Basis of Pellet Morphology: Restudy of Material from the Type Locality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serial grinding of a specimen of Ophiomorpha irregulaire collected from Coal Creek Canyon in the Book Cliffs of Utah, USA—the type locality of the ichnospecies—allows us to assess the validity of pellet morphology as an ichnotaxobase for species-level identification. The importance of O. irregulaire stems from its abundance in petroliferous shallow marine strata of post-Paleozoic age. Our three-dimensional reconstruction of the burrow wall of O. irregulaire demonstrates for the first time that it is composed of sand-cored pellets. The typically spiky nature of the pellets in cross-section is inferred to result from differential compaction of the sand core and pelletal lining. Rupturing of the thin outer clay coating of the sand pellets is considered to produce the distinctively attenuated, spiky outer surface to the burrow wall of this ichnospecies. This study demonstrates the utility of pellet morphology in species-level classification of Ophiomorpha and lends support to O. irregulaire being a cosmopolitan ichnospecies present in post-Paleozoic strata. It also demonstrates the need to ensure that ichnotaxonomic identifications are based on three-dimensional knowledge of the trace fossil in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it