MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050892293 · doi:10.1310/hct1203-151

Treatment Durability, Effectiveness, and Safety with Atazanavir/Ritonavir-Based HAART Regimen in Treatment-Naïve HIV-lnfected Patients

2011· article· en· W2050892293 on OpenAlex
Cécile Tremblay, Benoît Trottier, Anita Rachlis, J.G. Baril, Mona Loutfy, R Lalonde, J.S. Sampalis, F Boulerice

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHIV Clinical Trials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)Maple Leaf Medical ClinicUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRitonavirDiscontinuationAtazanavirViral loadRegimenInternal medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)GastroenterologyAntiretroviral therapyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To describe the durability of treatment, virological and immunological response, and safety of an atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study. Medical charts of antiretroviral-na'i've HIV-infected adults who initiated ATV/RTV (300/100 mg) from January 2004 to December 2007 in 10 Canadian clinics were reviewed. Data were collected from time of ATV/RTV treatment initiation until discontinuation of ATV. Durability of treatment and time to virological response were estimated with Kaplan-Meier functions. Change in viral load, CD4 cell counts, and lipid parameters were assessed with linear regression analyses. RESULTS: 176 patients were enrolled, 153 (86.9%) were male, and the majority (52.3%) were 40 to 54 years old. Duration of observation ranged from 1.6 to 56 months. The mean (SE) durability of treatment was 33.5 (0.7) months. There were 37 (21.0%) patients who discontinued ATV/ RTV, among whom 18 (10.2%) discontinued due to toxicity, suboptimal virological response, loss to follow-up, or death. The mean (SE) time to HIV viral load of <50 and <400 copies/mL was 6.6 (0.4) and 4.3 (0.3) months, respectively. At 96 weeks of treatment, least squares mean (LSM) estimated change in log10(HIV copies/mL) was -2.94 (P < .001) and +245 cells/mL (P < .001) for CD4 cell count. A significant LSM increase in HDL-C of 0.24 mmol/L (P = .007 for trend over time) was also observed; total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-C increased over time but their change did not reach statistical significance. The most frequently reported adverse event was increased bilirubin (16.5%). CONCLUSIONS: ATV/RTV-based first-line HAART regimen demonstrated durability and effectiveness and was well tolerated in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it