MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050948627 · doi:10.1097/wno.0b013e3181dfaa13

Primary Iris Neovascularization in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

2010· article· en· W2050948627 on OpenAlexaff
Conor Mulholland, Jack Rootman, Christopher J. Lyons

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyIntraocular pressureFundus (uterus)Fluorescein angiographyOphthalmoscopyRetinalNeovascularizationInternal medicineAngiogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anterior segment neovascularization may occur in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) secondary to optic nerve glioma or carotid stenosis (1,2). We report a case of primary anterior and posterior segment neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma occurring in NF1 in the absence of detectable vascular abnormality or glioma. A 14-year-old boy with NF1 presented with an episode of total loss of vision in the right eye lasting 20 minutes. Visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination showed conjunctival injection, Lisch nodules, and iris neovascularization of the right eye (Fig. 1). The intraocular pressure was 45 mm Hg. Neovascular closure of the angle was confirmed by gonioscopy. There was no relative afferent pupillary defect, and color vision testing was normal. Ophthalmoscopy showed widespread arteriolar narrowing and venous dilatation with an area of vitreous hemorrhage overlying peripheral retinal neovascularization. Digital ophthalmodynamometry showed that the right central retinal arterial pressure was significantly lower than the left. Examination of the left eye was normal.FIG. 1: Iris neovascularization and Lisch nodules are evident in the right eye.Brain and orbit CT and CT angiography, including the vessels of the neck, were normal. Carotid doppler ultrasonography and cardiac examination were normal. Retinal fluorescein angiography showed peripheral retinal neovascularization. There was no evidence of retinal artery or vein occlusion. Cryotherapy was applied to the areas of peripheral retinal vascular closure. Despite regression of the anterior chamber and retinal neovascularization, an Ahmed valve was required to control the intraocular pressure. One year after the initial presentation, the visual acuity remained stable at 20/20 in each eye. Shuto and Yamamoto (3) described a case of ocular ischemia in NF1 in association with hypoplasia of the internal carotid artery. Barral and Summers (2) described a boy with NF1 and absence of the right carotid circulation who developed ocular ischemia at an age of 19 months. However, isolated ocular neovascularization in the absence of optic nerve glioma or carotid abnormality is rare. There have been 3 reports of isolated retinal ischemia occurring in young adults with NF1 (4-6) and 2 in children with NF1 (7,8). However, none had the anterior segment neovascularization and secondary glaucoma observed in this case. We acknowledge that the raised intraocular pressure might have been caused by outflow channel dysgenesis associated with NF1. Patients with NF1 have a propensity to develop aneurysms, stenoses, vascular occlusions, pseudoaneurysms, and fistulas (9). Histopathologically, small vessels may be affected by scattered nodular smooth muscle lesions that arise from the walls of the arteries and obstruct flow (10). Abnormal vascular maintenance and repair may also contribute to the pathogenesis of NF-related vasculopathy with abnormalities of neurofibromin expression leading to altered smooth muscle cell responses to endothelial signals (11). Given the absence of angiographic or ultrasonographic evidence of larger vessel occlusion in our patient, it is likely that the ocular ischemia was caused by small vessel NF-related vasculopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207