IMPAIRED EXERCISE PERFORMANCE AFTER SUCCESSFUL LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recipients of heart, lung, and kidney transplants have impaired peak exercise performance (peak Vo2 40% to 60% predicted, reduced anaerobic threshold [AT]) without evidence of ventilatory or cardiac limitations. The aim of this study was to determine whether similar exercise impairment occurs in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: We studied eight healthy liver transplant recipients (age 42+/-9 [SD] years, 6 male, 31+/-13 months posttransplant). Immunosuppression included FK506 or cyclosporine, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Subjects underwent lung function testing and cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer. RESULTS: Peak exercise oxygen consumption (Vo2) was 22+/-8 ml/min/kg (66+/-20% predicted maximum). No subject demonstrated exercise desaturation or ventilatory limitation (peak minute ventilation 55+/-8% predicted maximum voluntary ventilation). Peak heart rate was 87+/-8% of predicted maximum. Early AT was evident (1.2+/-0.34 L/min, 48+/-11% predicted Vo2max). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients exhibit impaired peak exercise performance similar to that observed after other solid organ transplants, possibly as a result of chronic deconditioning or myopathy related to immunosuppressive medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".