MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051085258 · doi:10.1115/gt2010-22824

Response of a Disk Cavity Flow to Gas Turbine Engine Transients

2010· article· en· W2051085258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 4: Heat Transfer, Parts A and B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRolls-Royce (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsRotor (electric)Computational fluid dynamicsTransient (computer programming)StatorFlow (mathematics)Angular momentumTurbineRotational symmetryRotational speedPhysicsRotation (mathematics)Finite volume methodMomentum (technical analysis)Volume (thermodynamics)Control theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceClassical mechanicsEngineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integral part of the transient operation of a gas turbine engine is the behavior of the engine’s internal air system. It is desirable to model transient air system effects using a computationally efficient method, while accurate representation of these flows may require incorporation of the interactive effects of volume packing and swirl. Thus 1-D methods may need auxiliary relations to account for non-uniformity of properties in the cavity due to swirl or changes in the discharge coefficients of feed and exit holes to account for varying amounts of cross-flow. Consideration of the system response shows that flow spin-up times can be significant, suggesting the inclusion of the conservation of angular momentum in a 1-D volume modeling approach. To clarify the various contributions to the dynamics of these cavities, an axisymmetric rotor-stator disk geometry was modeled using CFD. Results are presented showing a notable effect of rotation. The presence of the rotor increased the time constant by a factor of about 2 for one case studied. The CFD results are compared to 1-D models. The results show improved accuracy of the 1-D model when the conservation of angular momentum is included in the formulation and recommendations for further improvement are made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it