MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051122545 · doi:10.1159/000244279

Intestinal Secretory Response to Atrial Natriuretic Peptide during Postnatal Development in the Rabbit

2009· article· en· W2051122545 on OpenAlexafffund
P. D. Brockway, James A. Hardin, Grant Gall

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyAtrial natriuretic peptideSecretagogueStimulationSecretionBasal (medicine)BiologyPeptide hormoneSecond messenger systemMedicineReceptorHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The postnatal development of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) stimulus-secretion coupling was examined in rabbit ileum. A positive correlation between age and ANP-induced secretory responsiveness was observed. The short circuit current (Isc) response in 14-day animals was significantly (p < 0.05) less than that seen in 21-day, 28-day and adult animals. Animals at 21 days of age were less responsive (p < 0.05) than either 28-day or adult animals which did not differ. The Isc response of infant animals (day 14) to the Cl- secretagogue 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine was blunted in the infant, as was the response to electrical field stimulation. The infant animals had higher basal levels of mucosal cGMP, but were still able to respond to ANP with an elevation in cGMP. The ability of the immature ileum to generate the second messenger molecule cGMP in response to ANP, but not to produce an appropriate Isc response to ANP, indicates infant animals possess underdeveloped secretory mechanisms and lack the ability to effectively couple secretory stimuli to a secretory response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207