MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051154034 · doi:10.1525/auk.2011.10216

Yolk and Feather Carotenoids in Relation to Female Condition and Reproduction in the Yellow-headed Blackbird (<i>Xanthocephalus Xanthocephalus</i>)

2011· article· en· W2051154034 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer L. Newbrey, Wendy L. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Auk · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell MuseumUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarotenoidFeatherYolkBiologyReproductionPlumagePasserineLuteinZoologyAnimal scienceOffspringEcologyBotanyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotenoids can be important antioxidants and immunostimulants for developing embryos and adult birds, and they are often incorporated into colorful sexual displays as signals of individual quality. The allocation of carotenoids to egg yolks and feathers can be affected by a female's physical condition, which can in turn affect offspring growth and survival. We examined relationships between yolk and feather concentrations of carotenoids and various indices of female quality (i.e., body condition, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, hematocrit, date of nest initiation, egg mass, reproductive success) in the Yellow-headed Blackbird (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus), a brightly colored passerine. Measures of physical condition of female Yellow-headed Blackbirds were correlated with the allocation of carotenoids to both eggs and feathers. Specifically, less stressed (i.e., lower heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) females had higher concentrations of β-carotene in their eggs than females that were more stressed. In addition, females with higher hematocrit values (i.e., more red blood cells) had higher concentrations of feather carotenoids. Timing of breeding was also related to variation in yolk carotenoid concentrations; later-breeding females produced eggs with lower concentrations of β-carotene but higher concentrations of lutein, which could be due to renesting or seasonal differences in carotenoid availability and use. Concentrations of yolk and feather carotenoids were not correlated, which suggests that individual carotenoids may have different functions in eggs and plumage. Carotenoid concentrations and female condition variables were not significantly related to the reproductive traits measured, but small sample sizes of females that fledged young may have limited our ability to detect effects. Our results highlight the need for further studies on the condition-dependent allocation and use of carotenoid pigments for reproduction and sexual signals in brightly colored female birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AukSame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207