← all works
Erratum for “Tracking the Built Status of MEP Works: Assessing the Value of a Scan-vs.-BIM System” by Frédéric Bosché, Adrien Guillemet, Yelda Turkan, Carl T. Haas, and Ralph Haas
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: low
Erratum for a civil engineering paper; the rubric lists corrections under T3, but this notice concerns a domain paper and has no bearing on the metaresearch ecosystem.
GPT-5.6 (high)T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high
An erratum is a contextual correction in the scholarly record.
Grok 4.5T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high
Published erratum/correction, mapped as contextual ecosystem material under the rubric.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
- Topic
- BIM and Construction Integration
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- University of Waterloo
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Value (mathematics)EngineeringComputer scienceMachine learning
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no