Mapping Cu(II) Binding Sites in Prion Proteins by Diethyl Pyrocarbonate Modification and Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometric Footprinting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although Cu(II) ions bind to the prion protein (PrP), there have been conflicting findings concerning the number and location of binding sites. We have combined diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-mediated carbethoxylation, protease digestion, and mass spectrometric analysis of apo-PrP and copper-coordinated mouse PrP23-231 to "footprint" histidine-dependent Cu(II) coordination sites within this molecule. At pH 7.4 Cu(II) protected five histidine residues from DEPC modification. No protection was afforded by Ca(II), Mn(II), or Mg(II) ions, and only one or two residues were protected by Zn(II) or Ni(II) ions. Post-source decay mapping of DEPC-modified histidines pinpointed residues 60, 68, 76, and 84 within the four PHGGG/SWGQ octarepeat units and residue 95 within the related sequence GGGTHNQ. Besides defining a copper site within the protease-resistant core of PrP, our findings suggest application of DEPC footprinting methodologies to probe copper occupancy and pathogenesis-associated conformational changes in PrP purified from tissue samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".