MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051280213 · doi:10.1061/41177(415)66

A Real-Time Remote Safety Monitoring System for Commercial Vehicle Operations

2011· article· en· W2051280213 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Tang, Dihua Sun, Yongfu Li, Weining Liu, Xia Liu, Liping Fu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckGlobal Positioning SystemFleet managementWirelessReal-time computingComputer scienceTransport engineeringSafety monitoringEngineeringAutomotive engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a GPS-based real-time remote safety monitoring system developed to address some of the critical safety issues related to commercial vehicles and buses, such as trucks, long-distance buses, expressway buses, and dangerous goods vehicles. The main idea behind the proposed system is to transform the conventional passive way of accidents management to an active way of eliminating the potential safety hazards arising in vehicle operations. Specifically, the proposed system involves equipping each fleet vehicle with an OBD (on-board device) to obtain real-time data on the vehicle's operating state, such as position, speed and direction. The collected data are sent to the fleet operations control center through wireless communication network, which can in turn send warnings or alerts to the driver had any incorrect maneuver or impending hazards been detected. This paper provides a detailed discussion about the architecture, components, and functionality of the system. The proposed safety monitoring system has been implemented and field tested in Chongqing, China, which has demonstrated its effectiveness in gathering valuable operational data and reducing vehicle road accidents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207