Dual Action of Dopamine on Growth Hormone Release in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of dopamine (DA) on growth hormone (GH) release was studied in perifused freshly dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells. Pulses of DA (0.01-100 nmol/l), each applied for 30 min, resulted in a prompt rise in GH release. This effect was reversible, concentration-dependent and partially antagonized by metoclopramide, a DA antagonist. The effect of DA was further tested on GH-stimulated secretion by human GH-releasing factor (hGRF). Perifusion with hGRF (6.25 pmol/l) for 2 min elicited an immediate rapid increase in GH release which lasted 20 min. Pretreatment of cells with DA (100 nmol/l) for 10 min and a subsequent hGRF challenge during continuation of DA perifusion significantly reduced the effect of hGRF pulses on GH release. The present data suggest that DA has direct opposite actions at the somatotroph level, stimulating the basal GH release and inhibiting the hGRF-induced GH secretion, and may thus be an important modulator of GH release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".