Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Implants Ameliorate Motor Deficits in Two Rat Models of Parkinson Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intrastriatal transplantation of gelatin microcarrier-attached human retinal pigment epithelial cells (hRPE-GM) may represent an alternative source for cell therapy in Parkinson disease (PD). The use of human retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) cells in PD relies on the capacity of these cells to produce l-dopa as an intermediate product in the eumelanin synthesis pathway. We investigated the behavioral effects of hRPE-GM implants on forelimb use asymmetries and hindlimb motor deficits in unilateral and bilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat models of PD. We report that intrastriatal unilateral implantation of hRPE-GM in rats with 6-OHDA nigrostriatal lesions produce an amelioration of the contralateral forelimb disuse and the contralateral hindlimb deficits. These results further support the possibility that implantation of cultured hRPE cells may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".