MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051481609 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204455

Conservative management of bilateral choanal atresia? Bilateral choanal atresia diagnosed in a 5-year-old girl

2014· article· en· W2051481609 on OpenAlexaff
Brandon Cadd, Rishi Talwar, Yogesh Bajaj

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChoanal atresiaGirlSurgeryPresentation (obstetrics)Airway obstructionAsymptomaticAdenoidectomyNasal cavityAtresiaPediatricsAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choanal atresia (CA) is an obliteration or blockage of the posterior nasal aperture, limiting or obstructing the nasal airway to the nasopharynx. The presentation of unilateral CA commonly occurs at a later age than those children affected by bilateral CA (BCA) and can often persist undiagnosed into adulthood. BCA, on the other hand, typically presents with respiratory obstruction within the first few days of life, or desaturations with or without cyanosis when feeding or during exertion and traditional teaching is that this is a life-threatening emergency. We present the case of a 5-year-old girl referred to our department with nasal obstruction, snoring and some mild rhinorrhoea. After investigation she was found to have a mixed bony and membranous BCA and no other craniofacial abnormalities. The BCA was subsequently repaired using urethral dilators and a drill and the child is currently asymptomatic of any restenosis. This case prompts discussion of the various presentations and options in management of CA as well as allowing us an opportunity to discuss the literature on the subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207