MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of Extravascular Lung Water in Hemodialysis Patients Using Blood Ultrasound Velocity and Optical Density Dilution

2002· article· en· W2051485722 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn S. Garland, C Kianfar, Gihad Nesrallah, Paul Heidenheim, Robert M. Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisDialysisBlood volumeMedicineBody fluidHypertonic salineCardiac outputSalineCardiologyDilutionUltrasoundBody waterHemodynamicsAnesthesiaInternal medicineBody weightRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In hemodialysis patients, volume homeostasis is an important clinical problem. The aim is to have patients at an ideal "dry weight" postdialysis, but current methods for accurately measuring dry weight are disappointing. Krivitski et al. (ASAIO J 1998;44:M535-M540) have described a novel technique whereby extravascular lung water (EVLW) may be measured using blood ultrasound velocity and electrical impedance dilution. They have tested this method in animals and achieved agreement between obtained versus gravimetric measurements. Isotonic saline is used as a nondiffusible indicator and hypertonic (5%) saline is used as a diffusible indicator. By injecting these solutions and following their transits through the cardiopulmonary circulation, a theoretic basis for the calculation of EVLW may be derived from the cardiac output, the water transferred to blood, the amount of sodium chloride moved from blood to lung, and the increase in blood osmolality measured at the moment of osmotic equilibrium. We have used this new technique to measure EVLW for the first time in humans in 18 stable hemodialysis patients with no cardiac problems. Measurements were carried out twice in each patient, the first early in dialysis, the second toward the end of a dialysis session where fluid removal took place. The values for EVLW were 260+/-49 ml early in dialysis and 230+/-48 ml late in dialysis. This fall of 30+/-45 ml was statistically significant (p = 0.011). EVLW normalized to body weight was 3.29+/-1.0 ml/kg early and 3.02+/-1.04 ml/kg late in dialysis, a nonsignificant difference (p - 0.073). The normalized EVLW values are almost identical to those obtained in animals (3.1+/-1.4 ml/kg) by Krivitski et al. (see above). We conclude that this new technique can conveniently and noninvasively give an estimate of EVLW in hemodialysis patients. The clinical value of this measurement has now to be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207