Wind‐forced seiche events on Great Slave Lake: hydrologic implications for the Slave River Delta, NWT, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A limited amount of research has focused on northern lacustrine deltas and the impacts of basin processes prevalent at these deltas. Wind‐forced seiche events have received little focus in deltaic studies. The Slave River Delta, located on the south shore of Great Slave Lake (GSL), NWT, is an ideal environment to study the prevalence of wind‐forced seiche events and the impact of seiche events on the hydrodynamics of the delta. This paper presents an historical analysis of seiche activity on GSL and the effect of seiches on water levels of the Slave River Delta. The seasonality, frequency, and magnitude of seiche events on the lake are quantified. A description of the wind characteristics that force these events is included. The radial distributary pattern of the delta suggests that water level response to seiche events within the delta may be particularly complex. Hydrologic data from delta distributaries illustrate the temporal and spatial dynamics of seiche response. During the open‐water season, seiche response in the delta is affected by the seasonal hydrograph of the Slave River and wind conditions. Spatially, the slope of delta distributaries governs seiche response. Responses are most similar among zones in the delta rather than among different distributaries. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".