A theory of nonlinear susceptibility in polaritonic band‐gap materials doped with multi‐level atoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the nonlinear susceptibility in dispersive polaritonic band-gap (DPBG) materials in the presence of five-level impurity atoms. Initially, the atom is prepared in a coherent superposition of two levels |b〉 and |c〉. The levels |b〉 and |c〉 are coupled to the upper level |a〉 with a coherent laser field. The nonlinear susceptibility has been calculated corresponding to transitions |a〉 → |c〉 and |a〉 → |b〉 using the equation of motion for the density matrix. The atomic system is interacting with the polariton reservoir. The effect of atom-polariton reservoir coupling on the imaginary part of the nonlinear susceptibility has been studied when the resonance energy lies in lower band of the polariton spectrum. It is found that by shifting the resonance energy away from the band edge, the system goes to the probe gain state. It is also found that by changing the intensity of the coherent laser field, the system switches from gain to loss state and vice-versa. (© 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".