MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051613924 · doi:10.1021/bi801514e

Hydrophobic Core of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein for Cholesterol Transport

2009· article· en· W2051613924 on OpenAlexaff
Himangshu S. Bose, Randy M. Whittal, Mahuya Bose, Dilip Kumar Debnath

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsMutantWild typeSteroidogenic acute regulatory proteinChemistryCholesterol side-chain cleavage enzymeBiochemistryMolecular biologyBiophysicsBiologyGeneMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), the first family member of START (StAR-related lipid transport) proteins, plays an essential role by facilitating the movement of cholesterol from the outer to inner mitochondrial membrane. Wild-type and mutant StAR binds cholesterol with similar intensity, but only wild-type StAR can transport it to mitochondria. Here, we report that the hydrophobic core is crucial for biological activity of proteins with START domains. Wild-type StAR increased steroidogenic activity by 7-9-fold compared to mutant R182L StAR, but both of them showed similar near-UV CD spectra. The fluorescence maximum of wild-type StAR is red shifted in comparison to mutant StAR under identical urea concentration. TFE increased the alpha-helical contribution of wild-type StAR more than the mutant protein. Acrylamide quenching for the wild-type protein (K(SV) = 12.0 +/- 0.2-11.2 +/- 0.5 M(-1)) exceeded that of the mutant protein (K(SV) = 4 +/- 0.2 M(-1)). Consistent with these findings, the hydrophobic probe ANS bound wild-type StAR (K(app) = 8.1 x 10(5) M(-1)) to a greater degree than mutant StAR (K(app) = 3.75 x 10(5) M(-1)). Partial proteolysis examined by mass spectrometry suggests that only wild-type StAR has a protease-sensitive C-terminus, but not the mutant. Stopped-flow CD revealed that the time of unfolding of mutant StAR was 0.017 s. In contrast, the wild-type StAR protein is unfolded in 16.3 s. In summary, these results demonstrate that wild-type StAR adopts a very flexible form due to the accommodation of more water molecules, while mutant StAR is generated by an alternate folding pathway making it inactive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207