MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nd<sup>3+</sup> Doped LiCaAIF<sub>6</sub> Single Crystal for Scintillator Application

2012· article· en· W2051664251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)DopingLuminescenceTransmittanceExcited stateAbsorption (acoustics)OpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryAtomic physicsPhysicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ααΑαNd 3+ 0.5% Doped Single Crystal LiCaAlF 6 Scintillator Was Grown by the Micro-Pulling down (µ-PD) Method. Powder X-Ray Diffraction Analysis Was Done and the Grown Crystal Was a Single Phase LiCaAlF 6 . it Was Cut and Polished to the Physical Dimension of 1 × 2 × 7 mm 3 . in Transmittance Spectrum, Nd 3+ 5d-4f Absorption Observed at 175 Nm and the Transmittance Became 80% at Wavelength Longer than 180 Nm. Excited by 160 Nm, Nd 3+ 5d-4f Emission Appeared at 180 Nm. X-Ray Induced Radio-Luminescence Spectrum Showed the Similar Feature with the Photoluminescence One. when Coupled with PMT and Irradiated by 241 Am α-Ray, the Absolute Light Yield Resulted 100 Ph/5.5 Mev α.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it