MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nd<sup>3+</sup> Doped LiCaAIF<sub>6</sub> Single Crystal for Scintillator Application

2012· article· en· W2051664251 on OpenAlexaff
Takayuki Yanagida, Yoshisuke Futami, Noriaki Kawaguchi, Jan Pejchal, Yutaka Fujimoto, Shunsuke Kurosawa, Yuui Yokota, Akira Yoshikawa

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)DopingLuminescenceTransmittanceExcited stateAbsorption (acoustics)OpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryAtomic physicsPhysicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ααΑαNd3+ 0.5% Doped Single Crystal LiCaAlF6 Scintillator Was Grown by the Micro-Pulling down (µ-PD) Method. Powder X-Ray Diffraction Analysis Was Done and the Grown Crystal Was a Single Phase LiCaAlF6. it Was Cut and Polished to the Physical Dimension of 1 × 2 × 7 mm3. in Transmittance Spectrum, Nd3+ 5d-4f Absorption Observed at 175 Nm and the Transmittance Became 80% at Wavelength Longer than 180 Nm. Excited by 160 Nm, Nd3+ 5d-4f Emission Appeared at 180 Nm. X-Ray Induced Radio-Luminescence Spectrum Showed the Similar Feature with the Photoluminescence One. when Coupled with PMT and Irradiated by 241Am α-Ray, the Absolute Light Yield Resulted 100 Ph/5.5 Mev α.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207