p-Nitrophenoxycarbonyl derivatives of Boc-protected diaminoalkanes in the synthesis of enkephalin peptidomimetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of p-nitrophenoxycarbonyl derivatives of 1-Boc-1,2-diaminoethane, 1-Boc-1,3-diaminopropane and 1-Boc-1,4-diaminobutane is described. These derivatives were used to synthesize five peptidomimetics, analogues of enkephalin, containing alkylurea units inside the peptide chain and at the C-terminal. All syntheses were carried out in solid phase on MBHA resin. Peptidomimetics with alkylurea units inserted into the peptide chain were synthesized using the standard method employing the Boc-strategy, with TFA deprotection and HF cleavage. The analogue containing a C-terminal alkylurea unit was synthesized using the Boc-strategy, with HCl/dioxane deprotection and TFA cleavage. All of the analogues were examined for opioid activity in GPI and MVD assays. The activity of the analogue containing a C-terminal alkylurea unit was comparable to that of [Leu5]-enkephalin, while the other analogues were less active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".