MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051765847 · doi:10.1038/ajg.2008.162

Differentiating Intestinal Tuberculosis From Crohn's Disease: A Diagnostic Challenge

2009· review· en· W2051765847 on OpenAlexaff
Majid A. Almadi, Subrata Ghosh, Abdulrahman Aljebreen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineINTESTINAL TUBERCULOSISCrohn's diseaseTuberculosisDiseaseCrohn diseaseImmunologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the changing epidemiology of Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB), we are in an era where the difficulty facing physicians in discriminating between the two diseases has increased, and the morbidity and mortality resulting from a delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis is considerably high. In this article, we examine the changing trends in the epidemiology of CD and ITB, in addition to clinical features that aid in the differentiation of both diseases. The value of various laboratory, serological, and the tuberculin skin tests are reviewed as well. The use of an interferon-gamma-release assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold, in the workup of these patients and its value in populations where the bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine is still administered is discussed. Different radiological, endoscopic, and pathological similarities and features that can aid the clinician in reaching a rapid diagnosis are reviewed as well. The association between mycobacteria and CD, the concerns with the practice of antituberculosis medication trials in areas where tuberculosis (TB) is endemic, as well as extrapulmonary TB induced by the use of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha agents are delineated in this article. Furthermore, we propose an algorithm for the investigation of patients in whom the differential diagnosis encompasses CD and ITB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations256
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisFrench-language works237,207