Improvement in rejection of human decay accelerating factor transgenic pig-to-primate renal xenografts with administration of rabbit antithymocyte serum1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Survival in pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation is currently limited by acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR). We hypothesized that the administration of rabbit antithymocyte serum (RATS) would delay or prevent AHXR as compared with a cyclophosphamide (CyP)-based immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: Nine baboons received life-supporting heterotopic single-kidney transplants from human decay accelerating factor transgenic pigs. Immunosuppression consisted of GAS (a galactosyl alpha-1,3-galactose analog), cyclosporine, and steroids. Group 1 (n=2) was also treated with CyP and a rapamycin derivative (RAD), group 2 (n=4) received RATS and RAD, and group 3 (n=3) received only RATS. Animals were maintained until death or sacrifice because of uncontrollable rejection or other complications. Graft histopathology was assessed at the study endpoint. RESULTS: Mean survival was 28+/-11.3 days, 23+/-2.5 days, and 20+/-2.5 days for groups 1, 2, and 3 (not significant). Graft rejection was the cause of death in both CyP-treated animals. One RATS-treated animal died of rejection; the others died of infections or bleeding. Two RATS-treated animals developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and one died of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis. Histopathology revealed severe AHXR in group 1 kidneys, involving 100+/-0% of the tissue examined. In contrast, AHXR was reduced in groups 2 and 3, involving 21+/-14% and 18+/-28%, respectively, of the tissue examined (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of RATS for CyP was well tolerated and resulted in reduced severity of AHXR in this model. Complications seen in RATS-treated animals may be preventable through the use of standard prophylaxis for infections. Our data suggest that further studies are warranted to explore the use of antilymphocyte agents in xenotransplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".