MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051810167 · doi:10.1111/ddi.12146

Assessing conservation regionalization schemes: employing a beta diversity metric to test the environmental surrogacy approach

2013· article· en· W2051810167 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregory J. M. Rickbeil, Nicholas C. Coops, Margaret E. Andrew, Douglas K. Bolton, Nancy A. Mahony, Trisalyn Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity and Distributions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsThematic mapBeta diversityGeographyEcologyMetric (unit)Environmental resource managementRedundancy (engineering)BiodiversityCartographyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Systematic conservation planning often involves the application of a regionalization scheme, which is assumed to delineate distinct ecological communities of target species. Commonly, such schemes are constructed using environmental surrogates; however, their effectiveness with regard to community delineation has been questioned in previous studies. Here, we aim to assess multiple environmental regionalization schemes' ability to delineate avian communities and to evaluate these schemes against a regionalization scheme built using species data directly. Location British C olumbia, C anada. Methods We employed a beta diversity metric using community data from the BC Breeding B ird Atlas in multiple analysis of similarity ( ANOSIM ) tests, to assess the ability of a number of environmental regionalization schemes to delineate species turnover. We also developed a new species‐based scheme using kriged local beta diversity values and a thematic resolution optimized through ANOSIM testing, which was then evaluated against the previously tested schemes. Results All regionalization schemes delineated significant patterns in community structure, with the Bird Conservation Regions performing most similarly to the species‐based regionalization. Regionalizations that required regions to be spatially contiguous outperformed non‐contiguous regionalizations. Increasing thematic resolution (the number of regions within a regionalization) improved a regionalization's overall performance; however, regional redundancy also increased. Main conclusions We argue that environmental regionalizations can function as effective alternatives to species‐based regionalizations, particularly in areas with poor availability of species data. Also, we conclude that spatially contiguous regionalizations are superior to non‐contiguous ones for delineating distinct communities. Lastly, we demonstrate how thematic resolution represents a trade‐off between overall regionalization performance and regional redundancy, and how differing thematic resolutions can be employed depending upon the goals of the user.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversity and DistributionsSame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207