Biochemical analysis of theXenopus laevis TCR/CD3 complex supports the "stepwise evolution" model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The TCR/CD3 complex of a cold-blooded vertebrate, the amphibian Xenopus laevis, was biochemically characterized with a cross-reactive polyclonal antiserum recognizing a conserved epitope in the cytoplasmic domain of CD3E. The specificity and utility of this reagent was validated by Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation of the well-characterized chicken TCR/CD3 complex. Cross-reactivity with the X. laevis CD3E protein was demonstrated by specific staining of sorted CD8+ cells. Immunohistology on both tadpoles and adult tissues suggests this antiserum will be instrumental in the localization of Xenopus T cells and most likely NK cells. Double staining of tissue sections with an anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody confirmed that this staining is specific. The antiserum was also used for the biochemical analyses of X. laevis TCR/CD3 complex. The 75-kDa alphabeta TCR heterodimer could be separated into a 40-kDa acidic TCR alpha chain and a 35-kDa basic TCR beta chain. Two CD3 proteins, both comigrating at approximately 19 kDa, were associated with the TCR heterodimer. Removal of N-linked carbohydrates yielded CD3 proteins of 19 kDa and 16.5 kDa, most likely representing the CD3epsilon and CD3gamma/delta homologues, respectively. An additional band of 110 kDa represents a multimeric complex of the TCR heterodimer covalently linked to a CD3 dimer. These properties of the Xenopus TCR/CD3 complex substantiate a stepwise evolutionary model for the CD3 protein family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".