MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051863170 · doi:10.2118/09-01-49

Optimization of Solvent Aided Process

2009· article· en· W2051863170 on OpenAlexaff
Suraj Gupta, Simon Gittins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersIndian Institute of Technology Delhi
KeywordsInjectorPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionAsphaltSolventProcess engineeringOil fieldDilutionProcess (computing)ViscosityOil sandsCapital costEnvironmental scienceChemistryMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Solvent Aided Process (SAP), described previously by the authors, is an improvement to SAGD that promises to enhance the economics of bitumen/heavy oil recovery projects and reduce water usage. In SAP, a small amount of hydrocarbon solvent (such as a low molecular weight alkane) is introduced as an additive to the injected steam during SAGD. The viscosity of the oil is reduced due to solvent dilution in addition to heating. SAP holds the promise of significantly improving the energy efficiency of SAGD, thus, reducing the heat requirement. Encana's field trials of SAP, discussed elsewhere, have shown the practical upside of this process. This paper discusses two conceptual optimizations of SAP. SAP reduces the effective steam-oil ratio (SOR) of SAGD. However, this comes at a cost as a part of the injected solvent is retained in the reservoir and lost in terms of economics. The smaller this cost is, the better are the economics of SAP. In this paper, the merits and drawbacks of using two alternate substances, SO2 and olefinated light alkanes, as solvents are discussed. Bottom-up SAP is a special geometrical configuration of SAP, discussed before. In this variant of the SAP process, bitumen recovery progresses from the bottom to the top of the reservoir, and employs injector and producer wells that are spaced horizontally apart rather than being in the same vertical plane. For large horizontal spacing between the injector and producer in a well pair, rates are low. On the other hand, for small spacing, the capital associated with the project is high. This paper explores the optimal horizontal spacing between the wells in a bottom-up SAP well pair. Introduction Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) relies primarily on heat supplied to the reservoir by steam to reduce the viscosity of the oil(1). In SAP(2–5), solvent dilution is also taken advantage of to aid in this viscosity reduction. The result is an enhanced rate of oil production and recovery leading to superior economics with lower energy intensity and a reduction in water usage. To further improve the economics and energy efficiency of the process, in this paper, two optimizations of SAP are discussed; namely, employment of inexpensive solvents and optimal configuration of bottom-up SAP. SAP economics depend on the extent of the residual solvent in the reservoir(3) such that, the higher the inventory and cost of the unrecovered solvent, the less advantageous it is to carry out SAP. In principle, any of the commercially-available light alkanes (e.g. propane, butane or natural gas condensate) can be employed for SAP. However, these liquids tend to be expensive due to their multiple uses in the industry and their price generally varies in sync with light sweet crude. This fact naturally offers an opportunity to further improve the economics of SAP by looking for other solvents, and the discussion below describes two such alternative, inexpensive solvents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207