MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051874969 · doi:10.1118/1.4815527

WE‐C‐108‐04: A Monte Carlo Investigation of Low‐Z Targets in a TrueBeam Linear Accelerator Using Varian Virtualinac

2013· article· en· W2051874969 on OpenAlexaff
David Parsons, James L. Robar, D Sawkey

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruebeamMonte Carlo methodLinear particle acceleratorImaging phantomPhysicsPhotonNuclear medicineDetectorRange (aeronautics)OpticsComputational physicsMaterials scienceBeam (structure)MedicineMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The focus of this work was to investigate the implementation of low‐Z targets in a TrueBeam linear accelerator (linac) using Monte Carlo simulations. Methods: Simulation of a TrueBeam linac was accomplished by using Varian Virtualinac. Virtualinac is a cloud based web application utilizing GEANT4 Monte Carlo code to model TrueBeam components. Phase spaces were recorded above the jaws and used as input to BEAMnrc simulations of the lower portion of TrueBeam. Dose distributions and spectral distributions were calculated using DOSXYZnrc and BEAMdp, respectively. For validation, 6 MV flattened and FFF photon beams were generated and compared to measurement. Two low‐Z targets were investigated: a carbon target operated at 2.35 MeV and the proposed 2.50 MeV commercial imaging target. The carbon target was also simulated in a 2100EX Clinac using BEAMnrc. Contrast simulations were made by scoring the dose in the phosphor layer of an IUD20 detector after propagating through 4 and 20 cm thick water and ICRP bone phantoms. Results: Measured and modeled depth dose curves for 6 MV flattened and FFF beams agree within 2% for 99.7% of points at depths greater than 0.85 cm. The two low‐Z target photon spectra produced in TrueBeam are harder than that from a Clinac. Percent dose at depth 10 cm is greater by 8.6% and 14.2%; the fraction of photons in the diagnostic energy range is lower by 7% and 25%; and contrasts are lower by factors of 1.2 and 1.5 (thin phantom) and 1.06 and 1.4 (thick), for the TrueBeam 2.35 MV/carbon and commercial imaging beams, respectively. Conclusion: Virtualinac is effective for Monte Carlo modeling of novel target designs. A significant spectral difference is observed between the low‐Z target beam on the Clinac platform, and the proposed imaging beam line on TrueBeam, with the former providing greater diagnostic energy content. This research was supported by Varian Medical Systems and was accomplished using Varian's Virtualinac Monte Carlo application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207