MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051890221 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.005

The Nuclear Oncogene SET Controls DNA Repair by KAP1 and HP1 Retention to Chromatin

2015· article· en· W2051890221 on OpenAlexafffund
Alkmini Kalousi, Anne-Sophie Hoffbeck, Platon Selemenakis, Jordan Pinder, Kienan I. Savage, Kum Kum Khanna, Laurent Brino, Graham Dellaire, Vassilis G. Gorgoulis, Evi Soutoglou

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research InstituteDalhousie University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAgence Nationale de la RechercheGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyFondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le CancerInstitut National Du CancerHuman Frontier Science ProgramEuropean Molecular Biology OrganizationFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSchlumberger Foundation
KeywordsChromatinHeterochromatinDNA damageCell biologyDNA repairBiologyHistoneDNAHomologous recombinationMolecular biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employed Stereo-seq combined with single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) to investigate the gene expression and cell composition changes in human hippocampus with or without Alzheimer's disease (AD). The transcriptomic map, with single-cell precision, unveiled AD-associated alterations with spatial specificity, which include the following: (1) elevated synapse pruning gene expression in the fimbria of AD, with disrupted microglia-astrocyte communication likely leading to disorganized synaptic structure; (2) a globally increased energy generation in the cornu ammonis (CA) region, with varying degrees across its subregions; (3) a significant reduction in the number of CA1 neurons in AD, while CA4 neurons remained largely unaffected, potentially due to gene alterations in CA4 conferring resilience to AD; and (4) aggravated amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques in CA1 and stratum lucidum, radiatum, and moleculare (SLRM), and integration of Stereo-seq map with Aβ staining revealed a sequential enrichment of microglia and astrocytes around Aβ plaques. Finally, reduced brain-derived extracellular vesicles carrying cholecystokinin (CCK) and peripheral myelin protein 2 (PMP2) in AD plasma highlighted their diagnostic potential for clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207