Cystic fibrosis gene mutations and infertile men with primary testicular failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been proposed that the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis, called the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, may play an important role in the process of spermatogenesis. A group of azoospermic men with primary testicular failure underwent CFTR mutation analysis, including assessment of the intron 8 polythymidine tract (IVS8-T tract). An association was not found between CFTR mutations or the 5T variant of the IVS8-T tract and the primary testicular failure phenotype. This finding suggests that CFTR does not play a significant role in the aetiopathogenesis of primary spermatogenic dysfunction. Therefore, the abnormal testicular histological findings in some post-pubertal men with cystic fibrosis may be a result of nutritional deficiency or testicular obstruction rather than a primary defect in spermatogenesis. In addition, the decreased sperm count in oligozoospermic men with CFTR mutations may be secondary to partial reproductive tract obstruction and not abnormal spermatogenesis. Lastly, routine screening of men with primary testicular failure for CFTR gene mutations is not warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".